DAILY TOL: Tree of Liberty

The framer’s of our Constitution were a non-trusting lot.  Even a cursory examination of how the three branches of government interact shines a bright light on either their intense paranoia or inspired genius.  They knew that in man’s quest for power and control, the people would fear a government that did not fear the people.

The best way, they reasoned, to keep a government fearful of the people is by keeping that government from amassing too much power.  The first step to keep a government from amassing too much power is to split it into three parts.  Then, just to be sure, our framers interlocked the three parts in such a way that any stretch by one part to gain power would place stress on the other two and thereby maintain the desired equilibrium.  Paranoid…perhaps.  Genius…undoubtedly.

We have the Legislative branch where the raucous House of Representatives provides the closest link between the elected and the electorate to which they have to answer every two years.  It is in the House that passions flare and the inspired ideas of the people are often first given voice.  If the House is the cup in which our passions boil, the Senate is the saucer that protects the People from scalding coffee that sloshes over the side.  The Senate…where one lone voice can halt the entire body and where 60 must agree before a vote can even be taken.  It is in this most deliberative of bodies where the President must go for advice and consent when appointing those who have their hands on the levers of power.  This advice and consent provides accountability to the People indirectly through their elected Senators.

We recently witnessed one of the most crucial examples of advice and consent with the confirmation of our new Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor.  This confirmation process isn’t optional.  It is clearly spelled out in Article II, Section 2 of our Constitution which states that all “high government positions,” are required to be confirmed.

How then is it that President Obama has more than 30 unelected, unconfirmed, high government positions currently filled with people answerable only to the Executive branch.  This is simply unacceptable and we must immediately demand that these positions either be confirmed by the Senate or explicitly require by Senate resolution that no appropriated funds can be used by, or in the service of, these Czars.

Because it is fashionable to place all Patriotic arguments in terms of Left and Right, Blue and Red, Donkey and Elephant, I include for your linking pleasure a pleathora of liberally inclined patriots who have taken serious issue with this egregious extension of power by the Executive branch.

• Salon
• Senator Byrd
  • CBS
  • NY Times
  • La Times
  • CNN
• CNet

Read for yourselves.  Become educated, which means doing more than mindlessly ingesting data without engagement or analysis.  This is our Republic.  Take responsibility for your role as a member of the electorate.  Hold your Senators accountable by demanding that these Czars, too, be held accountable.

Tomorrow I may be a CommonSensicrat™ just to keep things even.

First I’d like to thank Tol for giving me the opportunity to post on his site.  I don’t know how often I’ll have something to say, but I will certainly try to keep it well reasoned and pithy.

Today I’m writing about the Left-Right divide.

My lovely wife is a rabid conservative and one of her best friends is a left of center Democrat.  They love each other dearly but do tend to snipe.  Today I was struck that their sniping was more pointless than usual because they were actually on the same side of the issue.  However, the ideologues that owned their labels were, as usual, quite far apart.

This issue at hand was President Obama’s response to the increasing carnage in Iran and how those on the ideological left and right chose to react.

My wife, let’s call her Kate, correctly pointed out that Obama and many on his left were rather tepid in their support for Iran’s protestors.  Where was the outrage from the bastions of liberal thinking, asked Kate?  They cared more for the President’s poll numbers than for their ideals.  Her friend, let’s call her Edwina, took offense because many of her left of center friends had been openly supporting the Iranian protestors and encouraged a strong American show of solidarity.

In this case, both women were right…and wrong.

The disconnect arose largely because of semantics and context. Kate defines “The Left” as the vocal minority of talking heads and members of the permanent political intelligencia. In contrast, Edwina’s view was informed by left leaners in her personal circle. The Left establishment has power and doesn’t want to risk losing it so they are dipping their toes in an issue that represents great risk to their power if it ends badly. Their sin lies in a willingness to place politics above a clear moral choice involving the grave matter of life, death, and freedom.

The Right establishment does not have power and covets it, so they encourage ‘bold” action because, for them, there is much to be gained and little to be lost. Their sin is merely a dark reflection of those on the Left. The greater sin, IMO, lies with the establishment Left in that they espouse core beliefs that, in this case, they willing forgo to achieve political advantage.

In short, Edwina’s left-leaning friends have been acting on their ideals because those ideals are more important that US politics. Good for them!!  CommonSensicrats all.

The establishment Right has been saying the correct things in too strident a fashion and for all the wrong reasons.

The establishment Left has been doing the wrong things for all the wrong reasons, chief among them is fear and an unwillingness to do something the Right suggests, even when it’s correct.

To those that would defend Obama with the Hungarian example or simply the “meddling” defense, ignore that great swath of land called, “middle ground.”

There is no reason why our country couldn’t have said from the outset, “America stands now and forever with those who seek to obtain and protect Freedom. Our hearts are with the Iranian people in their peaceful pursuit and our eyes are on the Iranian Government with the expectation that, as a society of laws, it will respect and honor the wishes of its people.”

I am Thomas Paine and I reject the notion that our country is Red or Blue.  I reject the notion that ideologues who blather within their coastal echo chambers speak for me or can define the beliefs of my friends and family.  Let them excoriate each other while the wise among us note that they exist on a mobius strip of ideas where extremes of Left and Right are but a hair’s breadth apart, driving our nation to ruin.

I reject it all and I reject them…in favor of Common Sense.

I was so moved by this letter that I’ve added it to the static pages above.  It’s from a grandmother and it could be yours, mine, or your neighbors.  It expresses righteous indignation, hope, fear, and love of country.  It is neither left, nor right.  It is neither Republican nor Democrat.  You likely won’t agree with everything, when do any of us agree with anything someone else envisions, but I’d wager that it resonates with you nonetheless.  If you have a moment, take a read.